| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Topic : "ABC's" |
Endorphin
junior member
Member #
Joined: 27 Jan 2005
Posts: 31
|
|
| Back to top |
|
noxi
member
Member #
Joined: 04 Jul 2003
Posts: 281
Location: Finland
|
 Posted: Mon Jan 31, 2005 1:14 pm |
 |
 |
| What are trying to say with this? |
|
| Back to top |
|
Endorphin
junior member
Member #
Joined: 27 Jan 2005
Posts: 31
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Drunken Monkey
member
Member #
Joined: 08 Feb 2000
Posts: 1016
Location: mothership
|
| Posted: Mon Jan 31, 2005 1:46 pm |
|
|
| its a puzzle that contains the meaning of life |
|
| Back to top |
|
Heysoos
member
Member #
Joined: 24 Mar 2004
Posts: 294
Location: the New Mexico
|
| Posted: Mon Jan 31, 2005 2:23 pm |
|
|
I find this one much more intriguing than the first one in the other thread. keep at it, I am starting to see some potential for interesting things if you develop this rather unique way of painting more. Would you consider this a form of Pop Art?
_________________
http://www.angelfire.com/art2/wfkeil |
|
| Back to top |
|
Endorphin
junior member
Member #
Joined: 27 Jan 2005
Posts: 31
|
| Posted: Mon Jan 31, 2005 2:41 pm |
|
|
| Heysoos wrote: |
| I find this one much more intriguing than the first one in the other thread. keep at it, I am starting to see some potential for interesting things if you develop this rather unique way of painting more. Would you consider this a form of Pop Art? |
Pop art? That's a good one, because I guess that in a way it is. I want this to be light, enjoyable, and where possible impressionable. Does that qualify for pop art?
Endorphin,
http://www.visualdatasynthesis.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
Heysoos
member
Member #
Joined: 24 Mar 2004
Posts: 294
Location: the New Mexico
|
| Posted: Mon Jan 31, 2005 3:16 pm |
|
|
kinda. I was thinking of how your style reminded me of someone like lichtenstein where he used the big dots to paint his image to kind of purposefully depersonalize it where as you are using this super computery diagram-like look in the same way.
Its kind like when you look at a blueprint of something that you are unfamiliar with, or like some scientific equation that you don't have enough education to understand but you know it must make sense in some way if you could only decipher it. Except in this case its an equation to something much more abstract, like the secret of happiness. I think the reason this works better than the first one is that you used enough recognizable symbols that people can start making ties to things even though it doesn't necessarily make a lot of sense.
_________________
http://www.angelfire.com/art2/wfkeil |
|
| Back to top |
|
Endorphin
junior member
Member #
Joined: 27 Jan 2005
Posts: 31
|
| Posted: Mon Jan 31, 2005 4:14 pm |
|
|
| Heysoos wrote: |
kinda. I was thinking of how your style reminded me of someone like lichtenstein where he used the big dots to paint his image to kind of purposefully depersonalize it where as you are using this super computery diagram-like look in the same way.
. |
Oh, yea, Lichtenstein. I have my own version of his Topgun Dreamer. Mine's a little higher-techy though, imho.
_________________
Endorphin,
http://www.visualdatasynthesis.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
[Shizo]
member
Member #
Joined: 22 Oct 1999
Posts: 3938
|
| Posted: Mon Jan 31, 2005 6:13 pm |
|
|
| Sam ti hui. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
